<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tom Young for Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomyoungforsenate.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on House Approves Redistricting Plan &#8212; Weekly Legislative Update from Rep. Tom Young by Anthony Fulmer</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2011/06/20/house-approves-redistricting-plan-weekly-legislative-update-from-rep-tom-young/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Fulmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.winwithwp.com/?p=886#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I want to begin by thanking you for your service to your district. I have been very happy with the teamwork between you and Rep Bill Taylor in advancing legislation that is vital for our state.
I would like to see a change in the state law in regards to the counties and the way they collect property taxes. In the past I have struggled at times to make the lump sum payment of my property taxes. When I inquired years ago about breaking my payments down to make it easier, I was told that state law will not allow that. I think it would be a convenience to many taxpayers to be able to break their property tax payments down to where they can still pay other bills and meet expenses. At the same time I think it would benefit the counties by getting more money into their county treasurer&#039;s offices by allowing taxpayers to break down their property tax payments. The state could still require the same deadlines as now as far as having the property taxes paid off. 
With insurance premiums increasing with Obamacare and prices on everything from gas to groceries going up this would help out a little, and every little bit helps in today&#039;s times. 
Thank you again for your service.

Sincerely,
Anthony Fulmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to begin by thanking you for your service to your district. I have been very happy with the teamwork between you and Rep Bill Taylor in advancing legislation that is vital for our state.<br />
I would like to see a change in the state law in regards to the counties and the way they collect property taxes. In the past I have struggled at times to make the lump sum payment of my property taxes. When I inquired years ago about breaking my payments down to make it easier, I was told that state law will not allow that. I think it would be a convenience to many taxpayers to be able to break their property tax payments down to where they can still pay other bills and meet expenses. At the same time I think it would benefit the counties by getting more money into their county treasurer&#8217;s offices by allowing taxpayers to break down their property tax payments. The state could still require the same deadlines as now as far as having the property taxes paid off.<br />
With insurance premiums increasing with Obamacare and prices on everything from gas to groceries going up this would help out a little, and every little bit helps in today&#8217;s times.<br />
Thank you again for your service.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Anthony Fulmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Governor Nikki Haley Recognizes Rep. Tom Young by valerie m freeman</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2011/05/09/governor-nikki-haley-recognizes-rep-tom-young/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>valerie m freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.winwithwp.com/?p=841#comment-194</guid>
		<description>The governor&#039;s ideas about people being proud to live in s.c. is a positive note for everyone.Working together will bring prosperity and hope to many in this state.We are fortunate to have young people like Rep Tom Young in our corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The governor&#8217;s ideas about people being proud to live in s.c. is a positive note for everyone.Working together will bring prosperity and hope to many in this state.We are fortunate to have young people like Rep Tom Young in our corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on House Reconvenes this Week &#8211; Weekly Update from Rep. Tom Young by Carol McNulta</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2011/03/28/house-reconvenes-this-week-weekly-update-from-rep-tom-young/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol McNulta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.winwithwp.com/?p=788#comment-187</guid>
		<description>We were recently informed that our State Unimployment Insurance rate has DOUBLED for our teeny tiny business.  We have paid into it for 23 years and have had only 2 claims!!  What in the heck is going on?  On the surface, it sounds like the workers are being forced to bail out the slackers.  That can&#039;t be, can it?  The only winners these days are the people who don&#039;t work.  We certainly won&#039;t be considering hiring anyone any time soon.   It seems that the people who have struggled through this economic downturn and somehow made it (so far) are the ones being penalized - for tightening their belts and not giving up.  No wonder so many people are throwing in the towel!  Socialism - what a scarey thought.
Any  information re: who is responsible for this big idea, how they computed the new rates, and what we can do about it would be greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were recently informed that our State Unimployment Insurance rate has DOUBLED for our teeny tiny business.  We have paid into it for 23 years and have had only 2 claims!!  What in the heck is going on?  On the surface, it sounds like the workers are being forced to bail out the slackers.  That can&#8217;t be, can it?  The only winners these days are the people who don&#8217;t work.  We certainly won&#8217;t be considering hiring anyone any time soon.   It seems that the people who have struggled through this economic downturn and somehow made it (so far) are the ones being penalized &#8211; for tightening their belts and not giving up.  No wonder so many people are throwing in the towel!  Socialism &#8211; what a scarey thought.<br />
Any  information re: who is responsible for this big idea, how they computed the new rates, and what we can do about it would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Restructuring, Charter Schools, and Concealed Weapons &#8211; Weekly Update from Rep. Tom Young by John Schmersey</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2011/02/22/restructuring-charter-schools-and-concealed-weapons-weekly-update-from-rep-tom-young/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schmersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.winwithwp.com/?p=730#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Mr Young:
Please reconsider your stand on allowing people to carry concealed weapons without a permit.
There are to many handguns available to people with minimal training and through gun dealers that do not follow proper licensing proceedures.  We need fewer people carrying weapons ... not more.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Young:<br />
Please reconsider your stand on allowing people to carry concealed weapons without a permit.<br />
There are to many handguns available to people with minimal training and through gun dealers that do not follow proper licensing proceedures.  We need fewer people carrying weapons &#8230; not more.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State of South Carolina Financial Report by State House Update – January 19 – January 21, 2010 : TOM YOUNG FOR STATE HOUSE</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2010/01/25/state-of-south-carolina-financial-report/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>State House Update – January 19 – January 21, 2010 : TOM YOUNG FOR STATE HOUSE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/?p=177#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Also this week, I received a copy of the 2009 Financial Annual Report for the State produced by Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom’s office. The report can be accessed on my website by clicking here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also this week, I received a copy of the 2009 Financial Annual Report for the State produced by Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom’s office. The report can be accessed on my website by clicking here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State House Update – Week of April 27 – May 1 by John Steinberger</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2009/05/04/state-house-update-%e2%80%93-week-of-april-27-%e2%80%93-may-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>John Steinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/?p=126#comment-18</guid>
		<description>You neglected to mention the Rice Amendment to the TRAC bill to consider FairTax or the introduction of H-3992, the South Carolina FairTax Act by Rep. Rex Rice (R-Pickens).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You neglected to mention the Rice Amendment to the TRAC bill to consider FairTax or the introduction of H-3992, the South Carolina FairTax Act by Rep. Rex Rice (R-Pickens).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank You Aiken! &#8211; A Note from Tom by Melissa Ashley Frady</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2008/06/12/thank-you-aiken-a-note-from-tom/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Ashley Frady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/?p=44#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Tommy!  Honea Path is very proud!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Tommy!  Honea Path is very proud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tom Young Endorsed by Three Former State Legislators by Ken Fleming</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2008/06/04/tom-young-endorsed-by-three-former-state-legislators/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/?p=41#comment-10</guid>
		<description>My wife and I attended your gathering at Woodside last week because Kay and  Henry Holley had provide us with an invite.  We&#039;ve been in Aiken since Oct &#039;06 (from Knoxville), still work (contrary to the predominant demograph in Woodside), and have no kids at home to raise anymore (both graduating, as my wife and I did, from Clemson).  My wife came away from the gathering with a very positive impression since you were addressing issues such as having the ability to save money for college, save money during our working years for retirement, and the ability to retire with enough money.  (The latter two items effect where my familty currently stands.)  Though we arrived a few minutes late, the two main issues that I focused on were:  the ability for families to acquire educational vouchers and the negative ads that have been lodged against campaign which I&#039;ll try to address individually.

My short history is: born-and-bred in upper east Tennessee, graduated twice from Clemson, lived in Cincinnati, Lynchburg (VA), Knoxville, and now here.  When I was growing up and when we were in Knoxville, I can remember seeing the annual studies that identified Tennessee as the 45th or 46th ranked state in the union for education (thank God for having Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina I thought).  So we came from a state that, overall, had an atrocious educational system statewide.  The problem with using these studies is that the larger urbanized school systems in Memphis and the many of the smaller (agriculturally related) systems in the sparsely populated areas, biased the studies.  The school systems in west Knox county and Oak Ridge were consistently ranked in the top 5 systems in the state primarily due to a fairly thriving business climate fueled by families with much higher than  median income levels.  Though our schools were primarily funded through county property taxes, there were many unseen taxes (i.e., chemistry lab fees, math lab fees, english lab fees, etc.) that other schools within the county typically did not pay.  Many families within Knox county recognized the better education that was provided in west Knox county and &quot;moved into addresses that were not their true living address&quot; to also get the benefit of sending their kids to better schools.  Consequently, the average class size continued to grow in west Knoxville (anywhere between an average of 32 to 35 students in a class, when the state law requires no more than 25 +/- 10%) and the educational system was showing signs of going the wrong way.  (A long story, but due to the Knoxville City school system going bankrupt in the late 1980s, the county was then left holding the bag to educate both the city and county,  Immediately after bankruptcy the NAACP filed a civil rights claim with the Federal government that required &quot;fair and equal&quot; schools.  So the county tax base which had fled the city and moved west of the city was then funding the city schools.  It went so far as several county schools that had had swimming pools for swim teams had to fill them in since that would not be considered &quot;fair and equal.&quot;  Magnet (elementary, middle, and high) schools were built downtown (some 20 miles from our home) where individuals who wanted to bus their kids from the county to a Magnet school could do this and also get the luxury of having class sizes that were ~15 students per class.)     There were several good private schools that were close by and that I looked at sending my kids to due to that reason.  Being an engineer type (middle class), I couldn&#039;t afford the $8k/yr price tag to send even one kid.  If a voucher system had been provided, it would have provided me with additional money that may have allowed me to send them there.  In the long run, each daughter turned out fine, graduating and receiving fairly significant scholarships to Clemson, but it is an opportunity (sending them to private school) that I as a parent did not get and honestly would have liked to have had that opportunity.

Second, I met your opponent several times at the pool last year and had several discussions about kids, what he did, etc.  I don&#039;t know him well and don&#039;t know enough about him to have developed an opinion either way ... and, no disrespect, I&#039;d say the same about yourself.  At the Woodside gathering, the horse was beaten to death 3 to 4 times more than necessary about negative campaigning.  Other than many of the over 70 crowd that attended the gathering that may have needed the nail to be driven through the plank, I&#039;d suggest you back off on the number of times that you even allude to negative campaigning.  To me at least and I believe to most educated members of a society; make a point, move on, and don&#039;t go back to it.  Having been a Clemson person since the mid-to-late 70s your discussion of the negative campaign against you came off to me similar to the way in which a USC fan takes another loss to Clemson; &quot;but if we hadn&#039;t jumped offsides,&quot; &quot;but if we hadn&#039;t thrown 3 interceptions,&quot; &quot;but if half our team didn&#039;t have to spend Friday night in the Richland County Detention Center,&quot; ...

I will be seeing Henry tonight at a Luau and will get insight about both candidates and make a decision based upon some research I plan to conduct.

Sincerely,
Ken Fleming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I attended your gathering at Woodside last week because Kay and  Henry Holley had provide us with an invite.  We&#8217;ve been in Aiken since Oct &#8217;06 (from Knoxville), still work (contrary to the predominant demograph in Woodside), and have no kids at home to raise anymore (both graduating, as my wife and I did, from Clemson).  My wife came away from the gathering with a very positive impression since you were addressing issues such as having the ability to save money for college, save money during our working years for retirement, and the ability to retire with enough money.  (The latter two items effect where my familty currently stands.)  Though we arrived a few minutes late, the two main issues that I focused on were:  the ability for families to acquire educational vouchers and the negative ads that have been lodged against campaign which I&#8217;ll try to address individually.</p>
<p>My short history is: born-and-bred in upper east Tennessee, graduated twice from Clemson, lived in Cincinnati, Lynchburg (VA), Knoxville, and now here.  When I was growing up and when we were in Knoxville, I can remember seeing the annual studies that identified Tennessee as the 45th or 46th ranked state in the union for education (thank God for having Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina I thought).  So we came from a state that, overall, had an atrocious educational system statewide.  The problem with using these studies is that the larger urbanized school systems in Memphis and the many of the smaller (agriculturally related) systems in the sparsely populated areas, biased the studies.  The school systems in west Knox county and Oak Ridge were consistently ranked in the top 5 systems in the state primarily due to a fairly thriving business climate fueled by families with much higher than  median income levels.  Though our schools were primarily funded through county property taxes, there were many unseen taxes (i.e., chemistry lab fees, math lab fees, english lab fees, etc.) that other schools within the county typically did not pay.  Many families within Knox county recognized the better education that was provided in west Knox county and &#8220;moved into addresses that were not their true living address&#8221; to also get the benefit of sending their kids to better schools.  Consequently, the average class size continued to grow in west Knoxville (anywhere between an average of 32 to 35 students in a class, when the state law requires no more than 25 +/- 10%) and the educational system was showing signs of going the wrong way.  (A long story, but due to the Knoxville City school system going bankrupt in the late 1980s, the county was then left holding the bag to educate both the city and county,  Immediately after bankruptcy the NAACP filed a civil rights claim with the Federal government that required &#8220;fair and equal&#8221; schools.  So the county tax base which had fled the city and moved west of the city was then funding the city schools.  It went so far as several county schools that had had swimming pools for swim teams had to fill them in since that would not be considered &#8220;fair and equal.&#8221;  Magnet (elementary, middle, and high) schools were built downtown (some 20 miles from our home) where individuals who wanted to bus their kids from the county to a Magnet school could do this and also get the luxury of having class sizes that were ~15 students per class.)     There were several good private schools that were close by and that I looked at sending my kids to due to that reason.  Being an engineer type (middle class), I couldn&#8217;t afford the $8k/yr price tag to send even one kid.  If a voucher system had been provided, it would have provided me with additional money that may have allowed me to send them there.  In the long run, each daughter turned out fine, graduating and receiving fairly significant scholarships to Clemson, but it is an opportunity (sending them to private school) that I as a parent did not get and honestly would have liked to have had that opportunity.</p>
<p>Second, I met your opponent several times at the pool last year and had several discussions about kids, what he did, etc.  I don&#8217;t know him well and don&#8217;t know enough about him to have developed an opinion either way &#8230; and, no disrespect, I&#8217;d say the same about yourself.  At the Woodside gathering, the horse was beaten to death 3 to 4 times more than necessary about negative campaigning.  Other than many of the over 70 crowd that attended the gathering that may have needed the nail to be driven through the plank, I&#8217;d suggest you back off on the number of times that you even allude to negative campaigning.  To me at least and I believe to most educated members of a society; make a point, move on, and don&#8217;t go back to it.  Having been a Clemson person since the mid-to-late 70s your discussion of the negative campaign against you came off to me similar to the way in which a USC fan takes another loss to Clemson; &#8220;but if we hadn&#8217;t jumped offsides,&#8221; &#8220;but if we hadn&#8217;t thrown 3 interceptions,&#8221; &#8220;but if half our team didn&#8217;t have to spend Friday night in the Richland County Detention Center,&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>I will be seeing Henry tonight at a Luau and will get insight about both candidates and make a decision based upon some research I plan to conduct.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Ken Fleming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aiken Standard &#124; Fliers attack candidate Young for S.C. House by Mary Robinson</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/2008/05/28/aiken-standard-fliers-attack-candidate-young-for-sc-house/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/?p=39#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Please tell me your views on public education in SC.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me your views on public education in SC.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Plan by &#187; South Carolinians for Responsible Government Blindside House Candidate with Flier Carolina Politics Online: Your political road for the Carolinas.</title>
		<link>http://tomyoungforsenate.com/the-plan/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; South Carolinians for Responsible Government Blindside House Candidate with Flier Carolina Politics Online: Your political road for the Carolinas.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngforhouse.com/the-plan#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] you read Young&#8217;s positions on the issues, he sounds like a very good candidate to me. He has stressed the need for limited government and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you read Young&#8217;s positions on the issues, he sounds like a very good candidate to me. He has stressed the need for limited government and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

